criminologist

51Due教员组今天给各位留学生带来一篇纯原创犯罪学作业代写范文，讲的是社会过程的区别：学习理论和应变理论，以解决新西兰工作场所犯罪中的欺诈问题。希望这篇可以帮助到各位留学生，同时需要代写也可以直接联系我们51Due客服vx（vx：Jenny_dynh）进行咨询。

This paper attempts to explain the difference between social processes: learning theory and strain theory to address fraud in New Zealand workplace crime.
The definition of the concept of fraud in workplace crime is the logical starting point for studying the causes of fraud in workplace crime, and also the premise for effectively preventing fraud in workplace crime (White, Haines and Asquith, 2017). In the sense of criminology, some people define fraud in workplace crimes as “ Fraud in workplace Crime. , i.e., & other; Fraud in workplace Crime. It refers to the abuse of public power for the personal gain of social deviant behavior. Some people have defined fraud in workplace crimes from the perspective of criminal law. Fraud in workplace Crime. Refers to the & other; Fraud in workplace Crime. . AUD crime in the workplace is an act in which the subject abuses public power or uses public power to seek personal gain, causing losses to the interests of the state and the people, and should be punished by criminal punishment according to law. “ Both views have their legitimacy, but the former includes the logic of crime and the definition of corruption is broader than the latter. Based on the previous reasonable definition of the concept of workplace criminal fraud and the necessity of analyzing the social causes of workplace criminal fraud, the following is just a rough division of the types of workplace criminal fraud. In fact, “ There can be no crime without criminal law. And & other There can be no crime without criminal law. Non-criminal law clearly stipulates that the punishment is not a crime, and the study of the cause of crime can not be completely separated from legal norms. Therefore, the definition of fraud in workplace crimes should be carried out in the framework of the current criminal law. The legal interests of the crime of corruption and bribery are clean and honest. The perpetrators of such crimes are often motivated by greed, trading power and money, and selling out by public officials. The Criminal Law stipulates the crime of dereliction of duty to protect the legal, fair and effective execution of public affairs of state organs and people's trust. These crimes, whether abuse of power, abuse of power, favoritism and malpractice, or neglect of duty, are all acts of taking advantage of public power, ignoring the lawful, fair and effective performance of official duties, and ignoring the public interest of society. Eat food and people. Therefore, corruption crimes should be divided into two categories: corruption and bribery and malfeasance of power in New Zealand.
According to tension theory, when the actor cannot obtain social status and material wealth through legal means, he will have irritability, anger and other nervous emotions, which will lead to the actor's anomie state, so he adopts criminal means to achieve his purpose. Sociologist Robert Merton has made anomie a central concept in explaining the causes of crime. In "Social Structure and Anomie", he explored anomie theory and developed his strain theory through Durkheim's anomie theory. Merton argues that many of a person's desires are not necessarily "natural" but "culturally induced." And, the culture of any society is established some valuable goal, strive for and encourage every social members, in New Zealand's unique culture under the influence, gain wealth is the most important goal of everyone, when social members through the system means to reach that goal, won't produce tension and deviant behavior, but not everyone can through legal means to get material wealth, As a result, "the institutional instruments are severely strained." According to the differences between individual stress relief and social adaptation under pressure, Merton can be divided into five types: conformity type, innovation type, formalism type, withdrawal type and rebellion type. However, these five adaptations do not necessarily lead to criminal behavior. Social learning theory holds that crime is the result of the actor's learning of norms, values and behaviors related to crime. Criminologist Edwin Sutherland made a major contribution to the development of social processes: the theory of learning. In Principles of Criminology, his representative work, he put forward the famous theory of different contacts, which takes different contacts as the core to explain the causes of crime in New Zealand. The theory is that criminal behavior is learned by interacting with others in communication. The sources can be analyzed as follows: All the sources are academic journals and books, which are trustworthy and reliable.
The environment influences a person's character and behavior. In the activity groups of different families, schools, occupations, etc., people are subtly influenced by the group culture, and at the same time, they are unconsciously learning the behavior of others.
Individual behavior comes from imitation. Social learning theory emphasizes the interaction between criminals and their friends, denies the heritability of criminal behavior, and emphasizes the external and social interaction and learning of crime.
When a person makes a choice of behavior, if he agrees with the subjective or internal interpretation of the illegal interpretation exceeds the interpretation against the illegal, then he will take the lawbreaker as an example, learn his illegal side, and then into the quagmire of the illegal, even on the road to the illegal can not return to the scene of the crime. Strain theory pays more attention to the criminal's pursuit and realization of goals and the individual's adaptation under strain. Social Processes: Learning theories aim to explain the influence of others on criminals and their learning about others and illegal behavior. The separation of the two can not fully analyze the social reasons of duty crime fraud, but only the organic combination of the two, can fully explain the social reasons of duty crime fraud, and can comprehensively discuss the social reasons of duty crime fraud from the individual and the group of criminals.
Stress theory and social process: Learning theory explain the social causes of crime from the perspectives of ways to relieve the offender's stress and the group's influence on the individual. However, these two theories have their limitations in analyzing the social causes of job-related criminal fraud. Although both theories explain the causes of crime from both objective and external perspectives, they focus on different aspects. The explanatory power of strain theory or social process: Learning theory alone is not persuasive, nor can it independently explain the social reasons for the occurrence of two types of workplace fraud crimes without any illegal awareness. By revealing the goal of obtaining wealth and the institutional means to achieve the goal of strain, strain theory objectively answers the criminal causes of corruption and bribery from the type itself. However, it is difficult to explain the interaction between corruption and professional groups and the causes of the explanation of power malfeasance, and the type game politics also has limitations. As a result, the theory "can address some, but not all, violations of the law called crimes." !
Social processes: Learning theories have their limitations in explaining the social causes of fraud in workplace crime. First, the explanation of social processes: learning theories are limited to the mutual influence of social groups, ignoring the differences of individual offenders and the specific goals and pursuits formed under the influence of social culture. Second, the theory fails to answer the question of why, in the same circumstances, some state workers learn to commit crime while others resist corruption. Retype, social process: Learning theory to explain the cause of corruption and bribery crime is a bit difficult, because people are selfish, or what's bad about animals, if not through the study, based on the benefit and the pursuit of wealth and the use of the defect of system design, the behavior person to implement the possibility of corruption and bribery crime is particularly important, not to use the theory to explain the social cause of this kind of crime is necessary. Finally, this theory is about the cause of the general crime theory, does not have the special pertinence to explain the cause of workplace fraud crime. Social process: Learning theory points out that crime is learned, individuals are always in a social network, and the implementation of any crime is the result of the offender being influenced by members of other groups in the society. This theory is a systematic theory that can be used to explain most crimes.

To sum up, strain theory and Social Process: Learning theory explain the social causes of crime from the perspective of individuals and groups respectively. The latter focuses on national staff, a special group of professionals serving private learning public power in New Zealand. Fraud in both categories of workplace crime has its priorities, and only by combining them can the social causes of fraud in both categories of workplace crime in New Zealand be fully explained. The analysis of the social causes of corruption and bribery can not only be carried out through the strain theory, but also through the social process: learning theory.

51due留学教育原创版权郑重声明：原创优秀代写范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，51Due有权追究法律责任。主要业务有essay代写、assignment代写、paper代写、作业代写、论文代写服务。

51due为留学生提供最好的论文代写服务，亲们可以进入主页了解和获取更多代写范文提供论文代写服务，详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ：800020041。