代写范文

留学资讯

写作技巧

论文代写专题

服务承诺

资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达

51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。

51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标

私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展

积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈

Abortion is a very controversial issu

2020-05-21 来源: 51Due教员组 类别: Paper范文

网课代修,网课代写,作业代写,北美代写,代写

下面51due教员组为大家整理一篇优秀的代写范文,供大家参考学习。这篇文章讲述的是堕胎是一个很有争议的问题,关于它的辩论非常激烈。堕胎涉及到如何理解人的生命、尊严和道德地位,也涉及到母亲和胎儿之间的权利和关系。大多数关于堕胎的争论都集中在这些问题上。近年来,关于堕胎是否不道德的争论引起了公众的广泛关注。有人认为,堕胎的不道德性取决于有关家庭成员的想法和他们的情况,这将直接和程度上不道德的问题。其他人认为,在大多数情况下,堕胎是绝对不道德的。

Introduction

Abortion is a very controversial issue, and debates on it are extremely intense. Abortion involves how to understand human life, dignity and moral status, and also involves the rights and relationships between the mother and the fetus. Most arguments on abortion are focuses on these questions.  In recent years, the argument about whether abortion is immoral has attracted much attention from the public. Some think that the immorality of abortion depends on the thoughts of relevant family members and their situations, which would directly and extent of immorality towards this issue. Others think that in a majority of the cases, abortion is absolutely immoral. The common reason for not supporting abortion is due to the fact that fetus is a human being, a person, thus the fetus also has the right for life. However, not everyone can agree on this point. This essay will research about Don Marquis’s argument in the reason why abortion is immoral. For the shortcoming of the question whether the fetus is a human, Marquis gives his opinion from a totally new angle.

 

Reconstruction

Marquis explains an argument that does not simply rely on the fetus being a person with rights. As we can prove that deprivation of a future-like-ours makes killing adults and children seriously wrong and immoral, and the loss of one’s life is almost the creates misfortune that can happen to one. And abortion deprives feature of future-like-ours. Therefore, abortion is seriously wrong and immoral.

        

Explain

As the previous opinions of either anti-abortion and pro-choicer can hardly be proved completed, and moreover, they cannot persuade each other for they think under different logic structures, it is meaningless to further their arguments and try to beat down the opponent. The problem comes because they put their focus on arguing the moral status of the fetus, and this discussion about the fetus must finally depend on the concept of human being (Marquis, 2006). However, the concept of human being is essentially a debatable question. As the concept of human being exists rationale different understandings, and do not need to be clarified.  For this reason, Don Marquis chooses a new angle of dealing with whether abortion is moral or not. In his argument, he gets rid of proving whether fetus belongs to humans with rights or not, but ignores this ambiguous definition. He finds a new position with the concept future-like-ours to explain that abortion is seriously immoral.

From this point of view, it first comes to the question that why killing us is wrong. What can be easily come up with to this questions might be that a killing brutalized the one who kills or that others would experience great loss due to our absence, which refers to our relatives and friends. The action of killing is brutal because the fetus has no power to “fight” with those who choose to kill them. However, these seem to be the reasons, but are not the essential fact. The major reason why it is wrong to kill us is that it seriously affects the victim, in other words, the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses that one can suffer. As the loss of one’s life cause the absence of all the future of its own, which means the person has no chance to have any experiences, activities, enjoyments, projects that would make up its future personal life. In this way, the personal value of one is forced to deprive by others without any permit. Therefore, this essay arises a term of meaning of life (Marquis, 1989). Even though, a meaningful life has varied understandings by different people, it can reach common sense that the basic meaning of life is to experience it, no matter how it is. It is personal experience that makes everyone’s life different from others’, which proves the existence of each of us. From this point, the premature death of anyone is the deprivation of existence of him or her. The existence of one is denied, so there is no meaning of its life. This term can find its counterpart in the original essay of Marquis, that Marquis puts the focus of argument on personal life, while he also believes that physical life is important as the same. The two concepts of life are connected with each other tightly, as the loss of physical life will directly leads to the meaninglessness of personal life.

The value of experience, activities, projects also has two indications. On one hand, the bases of these things are valuable to people. Individuals who live in the world have a variety of feelings, however, no matter they are in sorrow or pleasure, these feelings are what we cherish and value. That is to say, people are attached with each other by the experience and different kinds of activities, thoughts and reflections. Therefore, the action of abortion would contribute to the sentimental experience of feelings, particularly to relatives or family members to the fetus. On the other hand, the side results these things bring are important to people, and at the same time, the value of this results again depends on whether people look them highly or not. These refer that the value of things comes from the recognition of individuals, whether current recognition or that in future (Norcross, 1990). If only a person is killed, not only current staffs that are important to him are deprived, but also the things that will be looked highly in the future. As the death deprives all the value in the future, killing adults is seriously wrong and immoral. Comparing with killing a living individual, which is considered to be much more brutal, killing a fetus has the same nature with differences in the ways of killing. In some cases, abortions are usually generated a wrong or inappropriate combination between a woman and a man. For instance, sometimes the parents of the fetus don’t have the ability to raise the child by themselves, therefore, they have to make a decision of having an abortion and give up this child. More pathetically, people are getting used to such reasons for having abortion and start to give understandings towards it. This way of thinking is generated form a wrong concept. Regardless of the living right of the fetus, abortion also means depriving all the possible values of the fetus in the future. Even though fetus is not a grown human being, fetus also has the future like each human being, since each individual grows up from an initial fetus. It has been proved that killing adults and children is not only wrong and immoral, but also illegal. Similarly, the abortion of fetus also generates misfortune and misery to the people around the fetus, because the activity of abortion deprives the feature of future-like-ours.

Even though abortion is not equal to premature death, it shares the similar identifications that deprives one from the feature of future-like-ours. The future value of a standard fetus includes a series of experience, projects, and activities, as our adults and children do. As it is sufficient to prove that killing adults and children is seriously wrong, it comes to the same conclusion to abortion.

 

Criticize

Under the opinion of Marquis, there are still several consequences that worth discussing. The first case should be mentioned is the group of people with serious diseases like AIDS or cancer that know they are dying. They believe that the loss of their future lives that they would have experienced is a misfortune to them. This also proves that killing a person is seriously wrong because of the loss of experience future like ours. The second case happens when people are permanently or temporarily unconscious. It is wrong to end the life of people who are permanently unconscious. As it is believed that because of the goodness of life, people have desire to life, which is not related to their current personal status. That means no matter a standard person or a long-term sleeping guy both have this desire to life. Therefore, it is wrong to get away the life of a person with desire to life who are permanently unconscious. So the similar reason can be applied to people who are temporarily unconscious. There situations prove that present consciousness is not a required element for the wrongness of killing as well. The last point should be discussed is that the original essay does not deny all situations of abortion. Special cases might exist, as if there are conflicts between the future value of a fetus and that of an adult. If it can prove that the future value of a fetus is not as great as that of the adult, abortion is allowed in this situation. Moreover, the fetus here refers to the standard one that can grow up to an individual, which gives space for premature abortion.

 

51due留学教育原创版权郑重声明:原创优秀代写范文源自编辑创作,未经官方许可,网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为,未经同意的情况下,51Due有权追究法律责任。主要业务有essay代写、assignment代写、paper代写、作业代写服务。        51due为留学生提供最好的作业代写服务,亲们可以进入主页了解和获取更多代写范文提供作业代写服务,详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ800020041 

上一篇:A Comparison and Contrast Betw 下一篇:A discussion of music of "Afri