Microsoft_Ethics

STEP 1 - Read the following directions. Each member of a team should contribute to the Group project. Unfortunately, this may not always be true for your team. To address the effectiveness of individual team members, a Peer Evaluation Form is used. The ratings you provide below will assist the instructor in assigning points to your fellow team members for their performance on a team assignment(s). Please rate yourself and each of your team members on the stated performance characteristics. Include additional comments and details in the “Additional Comments” section if necessary. Comments are required anytime you use a rating of “Rarely” or “Never”. You are responsible for submitting your peer evaluation by Day 7 of Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. The evaluations are confidential and therefore will only be seen by your instructor. STEP 2 - Rate yourself: John Tejkl / BLUE GROUP: Check the box that best describes how you would rate yourself on each of the following criteria. |Evaluation Criteria |Always |Usually |Rarely |Never | |Leadership/Collaboration: | x |  |  |  | |Contributed to the building of team consensus and purpose; actively listened and shared | | | | | |useful ideas and knowledge to accomplish the week’s assignment. Actively participated | | | | | |with week’s assignment. | | | | | |Work Quality: | x |  |  |  | |Work output was technically sound; applied appropriate concepts. | | | | | |Posted Work: |x | | | | |Posted and responded to the Discussion Board and File Exchange so all group members and | | | | | |instructor had access to input. Posted any agreed-upon documents. | | | | | |Dependability: | x |  |  |  | |Attended team meetings; accessible and communicated with team several times a week; | | | | | |individual work was prepared and ready for team as expected, on time. Followed commitment| | | | | |of Group Contract. | | | | | |Attitude: |  | x |  |  | |Committed to team effort; considerate of other team members; cooperative; able to give | | | | | |and receive feedback. Willingly offered and accepted new tasks. Worked to resolve | | | | | |disputes. | | | | | Additional Comments STEP 3 – Rate each of your team members: Team Member #1 – Name: Bennett, Charles Check the box that best describes how you would rate this team member on each of the following criteria. |Evaluation Criteria |Always |Usually |Rarely |Never | |Leadership/Collaboration: |  |  |  | x | |Contributed to the building of team consensus and purpose; actively listened and shared | | | | | |useful ideas and knowledge to accomplish the x xassignment. Actively participated with | | | | | |week’s assignment. | | | | | |Work Quality: |  |  |  | x | |Work output was technically sound; applied appropriate concepts. | | | | | |Posted Work: | | | |x | |Posted and responded to the Discussion Board and File Exchange so all group members and | | | | | |instructor had access to input. Posted any agreed-upon documents. | | | | | |Dependability: |  |  |  | x | |Attended team meetings; accessible and communicated with team several times a week; | | | | | |individual work was prepared and ready for team as expected, on time. Followed commitment| | | | | |of Group Contract. | | | | | |Attitude: |  |  |  | x | |Committed to team effort; considerate of other team members; cooperative; able to give | | | | | |and receive feedback. Willingly offered and accepted new tasks. Worked to resolve | | | | | |disputes. | | | | | Additional Comments Have not seen this guy once post anything Team Member #2 – Name: Michelle Garvelink Check the box that best describes how you would rate this team member on each of the following criteria. |Evaluation Criteria |Always |Usually |Rarely |Never | |Leadership/Collaboration: | x |  |  |  | |Contributed to the building of team consensus and purpose; actively listened and shared | | | | | |useful ideas and knowledge to accomplish the week’s assignment. Actively participated | | | | | |with week’s assignment. | | | | | |Work Quality: | x |  |  |  | |Work output was technically sound; applied appropriate concepts. | | | | | |Posted Work: |x | | | | |Posted and responded to the Discussion Board and File Exchange so all group members and | | | | | |instructor had access to input. Posted any agreed-upon documents. | | | | | |Dependability: | x |  |  |  | |Attended team meetings; accessible and communicated with team several times a week; | | | | | |individual work was prepared and ready for team as expected, on time. Followed commitment| | | | | |of Group Contract. | | | | | |Attitude: | x |  |  |  | |Committed to team effort; considerate of other team members; cooperative; able to give | | | | | |and receive feedback. Willingly offered and accepted new tasks. Worked to resolve | | | | | |disputes. | | | | | Additional Comments Team Member #3 – Name: Alyssa Hendrick Check the box that best describes how you would rate this team member on each of the following criteria. |Evaluation Criteria |Always |Usually |Rarely |Never | |Leadership/Collaboration: | x |  |  |  | |Contributed to the building of team consensus and purpose; actively listened and shared | | | | | |useful ideas and knowledge to accomplish the week’s assignment. Actively participated | | | | | |with week’s assignment. | | | | | |Work Quality: | x |  |  |  | |Work output was technically sound; applied appropriate concepts. | | | | | |Posted Work: |x | | | | |Posted and responded to the Discussion Board and File Exchange so all group members and | | | | | |instructor had access to input. Posted any agreed-upon documents. | | | | | |Dependability: | x |  |  |  | |Attended team meetings; accessible and communicated with team several times a week; | | | | | |individual work was prepared and ready for team as expected, on time. Followed commitment| | | | | |of Group Contract. | | | | | |Attitude: | x |  |  |  | |Committed to team effort; considerate of other team members; cooperative; able to give | | | | | |and receive feedback. Willingly offered and accepted new tasks. Worked to resolve | | | | | |disputes. | | | | | Additional Comments Team Member #4 – Name: Kimberly Lowell Check the box that best describes how you would rate this team member on each of the following criteria. |Evaluation Criteria |Always |Usually |Rarely |Never | |Leadership/Collaboration: | x |  |  |  | |Contributed to the building of team consensus and purpose; actively listened and shared | | | | | |useful ideas and knowledge to accomplish the week’s assignment. Actively participated | | | | | |with week’s assignment. | | | | | |Work Quality: | x |  |  |  | |Work output was technically sound; applied appropriate concepts. | | | | | |Posted Work: |x | | | | |Posted and responded to the Discussion Board and File Exchange so all group members and | | | | | |instructor had access to input. Posted any agreed-upon documents. | | | | | |Dependability: | x |  |  |  | |Attended team meetings; accessible and communicated with team several times a week; | | | | | |individual work was prepared and ready for team as expected, on time. Followed commitment| | | | | |of Group Contract. | | | | | |Attitude: | x |  |  |  | |Committed to team effort; considerate of other team members; cooperative; able to give | | | | | |and receive feedback. Willingly offered and accepted new tasks. Worked to resolve | | | | | |disputes. | | | | | Additional Comments Team Member #5 – Name: Molly Parks Check the box that best describes how you would rate this team member on each of the following criteria. |Evaluation Criteria |Always |Usually |Rarely |Never | |Leadership/Collaboration: | x |  |  |  | |Contributed to the building of team consensus and purpose; actively listened and shared | | | | | |useful ideas and knowledge to accomplish the week’s assignment. Actively participated | | | | | |with week’s assignment. | | | | | |Work Quality: | x |  |  |  | |Work output was technically sound; applied appropriate concepts. | | | | | |Posted Work: |x | | | | |Posted and responded to the Discussion Board and File Exchange so all group members and | | | | | |instructor had access to input. Posted any agreed-upon documents. | | | | | |Dependability: | x |  |  |  | |Attended team meetings; accessible and communicated with team several times a week; | | | | | |individual work was prepared and ready for team as expected, on time. Followed commitment| | | | | |of Group Contract. | | | | | |Attitude: | x |  |  |  | |Committed to team effort; considerate of other team members; cooperative; able to give | | | | | |and receive feedback. Willingly offered and accepted new tasks. Worked to resolve | | | | | |disputes. | | | | | Additional Comments Very strong member Team Member #6 – Name: Matt Zummach Check the box that best describes how you would rate this team member on each of the following criteria. |Evaluation Criteria |Always |Usually |Rarely |Never | |Leadership/Collaboration: | x |  |  |  | |Contributed to the building of team consensus and purpose; actively listened and shared | | | | | |useful ideas and knowledge to accomplish the week’s assignment. Actively participated | | | | | |with week’s assignment. | | | | | |Work Quality: | x |  |  |  | |Work output was technically sound; applied appropriate concepts. | | | | | |Posted Work: |x | | | | |Posted and responded to the Discussion Board and File Exchange so all group members and | | | | | |instructor had access to input. Posted any agreed-upon documents. | | | | | |Dependability: | x |  |  |  | |Attended team meetings; accessible and communicated with team several times a week; | | | | | |individual work was prepared and ready for team as expected, on time. Followed commitment| | | | | |of Group Contract. | | | | | |Attitude: | x |  |  |  | |Committed to team effort; considerate of other team members; cooperative; able to give | | | | | |and receive feedback. Willingly offered and accepted new tasks. Worked to resolve | | | | | |disputes. | | | | | Additional Comments