Good_Example

Nowadays, scientific investigation comes across various restrictions from the side of government. From one side, such restrictions are made in order to protect lives of people and natural resources, which importance cannot be underestimated. From the other side, it is reasonable to argue that they prevent science from making the progress. There is no unique answer whether such restrictions should exist. Decision about canceling them or intensifying should be made depending on specific field of science and research peculiarities. First of all, our government should give freedom to our scientific research so that they can utilize their talent and wisdom as much as possible on the discovering of the unknown world. Simply put if the government place few restrictions on the research the scientist will have ability to use every resource that could support his or her research in order to conquer every difficult problems which impede the developing of the science. It is well known fact that in the way to invent many indispensable drugs, many animals died. Nevertheless, ultimately it allowed producing indispensable medicines that saved thousands of people lives. If such research methods were prohibited, very likely that today even some kinds of flu would be considered as deadly diseases. Since human life is of the highest value, any research directed on protecting it, should not be restricted. Opposite, it should be even supported by the government. Medical scientists should not have any obstacles in face of restriction laws or rules, in order to provide humankind with revolutionary inventions that will allow saving our lives. However, the statement has ignored some very important aspects that we should consider carefully before we give the ultimate freedom to our scientists, otherwise, it will cause some serious aftermath. Still, take cloning as an example. The real reason that cloning is explored is because of the possibility of using organs from clones to give to other people that desperately need it. This idea is known to some as “organ farming”. This is one of the reasons that cloning should not be explored. Humans will be created for the sole purpose of using their organs for other people who need them. This creates an “inferior race” and shows the clones as nothing more than tools for society. Finally, the government should establish specific restriction on the scientific research, should take in consideration both possible positive advantages and negative consequences of it. Scientists, who are working with such important results as medicine, should not be fettered by any rules. In contrast, there should be established significant restrictions to prevent dangerous consequences caused by research with cloning or so forth. In conclusion, we should call for a balance between the benefits and the venture to the society, thus the well-being of the whole citizens is the ultimate goal of the research.