代写范文

留学资讯

写作技巧

论文代写专题

服务承诺

资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达

51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。

51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标

私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展

积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈

Comment on "Watch in the Desert"

2020-07-13 来源: 51Due教员组 类别: Essay范文

Comment on

下面51due教员组为大家整理一篇优秀的代写范文- Comment on "Watch in the Desert",供大家参考学习。这篇文章讲述的是鲍勃·里金斯(Bob Riggins)撰写的这篇怀疑论文章旨在驳斥地球上的生物与沙漠中的手表之间的著名类比。这些创世论的支持者通常会引用这种类比,以支持他们的观点并与进化论者的立场相抵触。作为一名高中教师,这位作家表现出了他追求真理的勇气,而不是被动地接受真理而没有自己的思想。

Comment on "Watch in the Desert"

I. Introduction

This skeptical essay written by Bob Riggins is targeted to refute the famous analogy of between creatures on the earth and the watch in the desert. This analogy is normally cited by those Creationism supporters to buttress their viewpoints and contradict the standpoints of Evolutionists. As a high school teacher, this writer shows his courage to aspire after truth rather than accept truth passively and without own thinking. Therefore, compared to others, this writer proposes more evidences and logical theories to support his refutation. He questions the loyal Creationists’ long-standing beliefs, which may provide more people including those youngsters to reveal the unravel the mysteries in our daily life. Moreover the website published his paper—Skeptical Report, concentrates on philosophical, natural and supernatural topics attracting most adolescents, which proves the initial purpose of this paper once again. After a long-term influence from families, most senior students may be curious about even rebel against their previous education. The main purpose of this paper may contain two parts. On one hand, the writer wants to refute the seemingly plausible viewpoints to free more people’s thoughts, meantime he can honestly and objectively depict the truth which may mislead and constrain the common; on the other hand, the writer may would like to be an example to the youngsters to question those long-time existed conventions and explore the unknown and neglected areas.

In a word, this paper challenges the classical analogy, which can be appraised as a fastidious one possessing both logical and scientific evidences to persuade his audience powerfully.

II. Summary of the essay under scrutiny

Bob starts with his own arguments by re-stating the core issue between Creationists and Evolutionists and listing the similarity between the development of watches and the evolvement of creatures in a relatively obvious way. This viewpoint can logically identify the leak of analogy. But, compared with the second argument, this standpoint is relatively lame. Then the writer continues his deeper statement with more scientific knowledges. His contradiction is fully supported by the differences between physical changes and chemical reactions just like the improvement of watches and the evolvement.

III. Discussion

Obviously, the watch in the desert cannot be analogized to creatures. As the initial argument mentioned in Bob’s paper, no matter when a watch can be found in the desert, there will be an equivalent or more complicated one working in other places. Moreover, there will be a sequence of watches to show the development. As a human-being, it is obvious that the watches are naturally developed rather than by magic or those supernatural powers. Therefore, if someone would like to illustrate the analogy between watches and creatures to demonstrate the Creationism, he or she must admit that both the improvement or evolvement is achieved by natural powers. Therefore, logically this analogy is not powerful and persuasive.

The writer uses this argument to re-state the core conflict between Creationists and Evolutionists that no one can deny the discovered evidences to prove the evolution progress. In case the evolution can be proved, Creationists’ viewpoint—every species is evolved and every creature is just duplicated, must be wrong. This seemingly plausible argument actually has its own leak. What we define natural powers and magic is from our recognition. In case there is a real higher species existing, for them those our-insisting supernatural powers may be natural. But the writer logically restates the principle divergence, which stops the analogy misleading the argument between Creationists and Evolutionists. In case the writer does want to logically support his viewpoint, the most persuasive statement should be—if there is a creator, according to this analogy, this creator must be created by his or her own creator, thus this viewpoint cannot prove the birth of the most original creator. But Evolutionism can explain the primitive life easily, especially based on the advanced chemical and biological technologies and theories, which is mentioned in the following section.

Secondly, this paper continues its viewpoints with more scientific information. The writer mentions the definition of a living system. Moreover, he proposes the development of watches are totally achieved by physical principles. As for creatures, their evolvement can be viewed as a series of chemical reactions. Thus, this analogy is not appropriate. The evolvement of a species is not only proved by those ancient fossils but also emerges to the life of a creature. But we cannot identify any self-improvement within the life of a watch. This can prove that how ridiculous this analogy is. Furthermore, the common features between all the creatures and the primitive and current conditions on the earth all stand for the point that the earth is a complete living system.

Compared with the initial argument, the second one is more accurate and without any leak. Therefore, from this perspective, people must admit the correctness of this viewpoint and the hole of this analogy. This can also explain why the disputes between Creationism and Evolutionism are more agitating and frequent before. In those ancient times, people cannot propose more detailed and especially visual evidences to prove the growth and evolvement of a creature. People can only prove their statement by logics or some apparent evidences like fossils. But with the development of science and technological, more chemical and biological reactions are observed and recorded.

IV. Conclusion

Mostly this paper expresses the statements and supportive evidences clearly. The information to buttress the author’s standpoints is accurate by carefully defined terms, fair interpretation about the analogy and opinions from both Creationism and Evolutionism. This paper skeptically identifies both logic and scientific leaks of this analogy. Furthermore, correspondingly, the author provides theoretic, empirical and logic evidences and facts to refute the statements. But the most inconclusive part of this essay is its logically-proved section. In case the author can prove a more persuasive logic statement, this paper will be more perfect. The author has proposed a relatively feeble refutation from the logistics, thus for those interested readers about this topic, they can avoid the same issues when discussing this topic.

51due留学教育原创版权郑重声明:原创优秀代写范文源自编辑创作,未经官方许可,网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为,未经同意的情况下,51Due有权追究法律责任。主要业务有essay代写、assignment代写、paper代写、作业代写服务。   51due为留学生提供最好的作业代写服务,亲们可以进入主页了解和获取更多代写范文提供作业代写服务,详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ:800020041。 

上一篇:Lyric Emotion 下一篇:“The smartest guys in the room